Spark for a revolution

Sometimes it’s hard to believe i can make a positive difference in the world. That’s reserved for ambitious, famous people — politicians and dedicated activists and heroes/villains of various stripe — who are in the news and have dedicated their lives change, for good or ill.

And yet i came across a post in Umair Haque’s fiery, iconoclastic blog Eidaimonics, a post called Metamovement about the movement that before our eyes seems to be going viral around much of the world (see, for example, OccupyWallSt.org or OccupyVacouver.com or OccupyVictoria.ca, etc. etc.).

Says Mr. Haque:

Where did this virus erupt? The simplest answer is: in Sidi Bouzid, [Tunisia,] where Mohammed Bouazizi set himself alight, in protest. What sent Bouazizi over the edge of sanity — or perhaps into the arms of a kind of hyperrational embrace of a singular act of revolt?

“…He was 23 and had left school early because his widowed mother couldn’t afford to keep him there. On 17 December Mr Bouazizi’s vegetable cart was confiscated by the town council which said he didn’t have permission to trade. When he tried to get the cart back a woman from the council slapped him in the face.”

Mr. Bouazizi, who died of his burns, was no icy, brave hero with newsworthy ambitions. He was an angry, confused young man pushed by systematic bureaucratic indifference into a desperate act, with no inkling whatsoever that his private protest would trigger the Tunisian revolution, which would spread like a grassfire into an Arab Spring, thence to flashpoints around the earth.

Haque again: And make no mistake — this is revolt; insurrection against a monstrous, barbaric status quo that’s failed too many, too deserving, for too long — while serving too few, too undeserving, far too well. 

It reminds me that the world seems to be growing ever tauter, ever more interlinked, ever more involved with tipping points and invisible connections and butterflies flapping their wings in Brazil setting off tornadoes in Texas. We can never know what effect we might have. In the present moment our actions are always of grave import, and we should conduct ourselves accordingly.

Dead to my Face(book)

This has been pending for months, as more information comes out about how Facebook.com is selling me and my info up the river to its marketers; as more Facebook privacy concerns come to light; as more annoying, unsolicited emails flood my inbox from Facebook services i never signed up for.

What pushed it over the edge tonight was three things:

  1. Carelessly and inadvertently missing a writers group meeting i was looking forward to, spending the time instead in front of a computer, checking (among other things) my Facebook account.
  2. This Mashable.com post — Users for Sale: Has Digital Illiteracy Turned Us Into Social Commodities? — making quite clear to me what i’ve known all along about whose interest Facebook is really serving.
  3. The realization that “socializing” — indeed, “living” — on-line is not healthy for me, and it’s time to back out and spend a little a lot more time and attention on the old way of doing things, i.e. face-to-face, or at least with my “content” not mediated and data-mined by a massive corporation.

So at about 10:40 p.m. tonight i impulsively began deleting my Facebook account. Continue reading “Dead to my Face(book)”

Canada: economic star (without vision or responsibility)

Everybody in Alberni-Qualicum got a lame-ass flyer from our MP, Dr. James Lunney, last week. It contains all of about 40 words (Dr. Lunney doesn’t like to tax his constituents with nuance) and is headlined Canada: an economic star (quoting The Economist magazine).

The above is my response on the clip-and-mail return coupon provided, urging the good doctor and his party toward some progressive — or at the very least, non-obstructionist — action on the most pressing problem of the world’s many pressing problems. Continue reading “Canada: economic star (without vision or responsibility)”

Spectacular gibberish

This fun bit of graffiti came my way today (thanks, Warren), and seems to be fitting given the paroxysm-of-the-week going on in Vancouver, where a new downtown bike lane has recently been approved.

Tofino, thankfully, is free of such nonsense — though me do have our share of both gas-foot Neanderthals and boneheaded cyclists. But at least we’re not at the stage of requiring columns like this October 7 one, by Province columnist Ethan Baron, that starts:

An outpouring of spectacular gibberish

What part of cheaper, healthier, environmentally beneficial don’t these folks understand?

There appears to be no end to the irrationality of citizens opposed to separated bike lines in downtown Vancouver. The city’s approval Tuesday of a Hornby Street trial lane has provoked an outpouring of spectacular gibberish.

“These cyclist Nazis are taking over our city,” one Province reader laments on our website. “They will not be happy until all our streets are converted too [sic] bike lanes.”

Another reader complains that drivers are “subsidizing” cyclists….

In the column (link), Baron goes on to demolish the common preconceptions of auto supremacists in refreshingly blunt manner.

Geez, people, the world is changing. I know it’s uncomfortable, but you’ve got to start adapting the habits that you’ve coasted along on for the last 40 years.

LIFE for Betty K?!?

After a long break away from blogging, i’ve decided to start posting a few things again. Here’s my letter to the  topmost legal captains of B.C. on a matter of some import. First, the situation, excerpted from an excellent post on the rather blunderbuss The Galloping Beaver blog, called Life sentence for Betty K? (well worth the quick read):

. . . Betty Krawczyk was 65 years old when she went to jail for Clayoquot Sound. . . . She went to jail again at age 78 for standing in front of bulldozers in 2006 to protest the building of the Sea-to-Sky Highway. . . . She . . . went back to prison for another 10 months. . . .
After serving out her last sentence in full, Betty appealed it on the grounds that the squelching of protest inconvenient to corporations and governments is an illegitimate use of the legal system.
The Attorney General’s response to her appeal has been to recommend the court re-sentence her under the rules of “accumulated convictions”, designate her a chronic offender, and lock her up for life!

So, my letter:

TO: Michael de Jong, Attorney General <AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>
Michael Brundrett, prosecutor: <mike.brundrett@gov.bc.ca>

CC: Gordon Campbell <premier@gov.bc.ca>

Dear Attorney General,
However much Ms. Krawczyk is a thorn in your side, your current stratagem of using some far-removed and distasteful precedent to propose locking her up for years is highly repugnant to this lover of free society. To equate having a strong environmental consicence with having a pathological disease insulting, absurd, and a serious undermining of democratic principles. Who’s next on your hit list — advocates for the homeless? Opposition party members? Because with this line of thinking, you can pretty much get rid of anybody  you want.
Find some perspective, gentlemen. Murderers go away for life. Kidnappers. Unrepentant, hard-core criminals. Not old ladies who stand in the road, struggling to protect what’s left of our ever-diminishing environment. As unconventional as she is, Ms Krawczyk is a hero to many; notwithstanding that, she deserves reasonable treatment at the hands of our so-called system of justice. I predict that locking the lady away for many-to-life will bring down a firestorm of protest and controversy from properly thinking people throughout this province (and the world) — something you would come quickly to regret.

Sincerely yours,

greg blanchette
Tofino, BC